The same Nasdaq-100 is taxed very differently depending on where the fund is registered. Here is what you can buy across 29 jurisdictions, organised by where you live, with the domicile, fee and size of each.
29
Regions covered
66
Products listed
45
Nasdaq-100
21
S&P 500
Check the domicile before the fee
What decides which Nasdaq-100 ETF a non-US investor should own is never the 0.05pp fee difference — it is the country the fund is registered in.
01
US estate tax
A non-US tax resident holding a US-domiciled ETF faces up to 40% US estate tax on everything above the $60,000 exemption. Irish-domiciled UCITS ETFs are not US-situs assets and fall outside this entirely.
02
Dividend withholding
US-domiciled ETFs withhold 30% when paying a non-US resident. An Irish UCITS is withheld at just 15% inside the fund, and the US does not tax the investor a second time on the distribution.
03
Domicile ≠ listing venue ≠ market
The most-confused point: 3455 trades in Hong Kong dollars on HKEX but is registered in the US, so estate tax still applies. 3086 trades on the same exchange, tracks the same index, and is registered in Hong Kong — no such problem.
Pick where you live
Pick one region and see only that one. Grouped by tax jurisdiction rather than geography — Asia-Pacific, Europe and MEA all face the same problem. Regions marked "—" list nothing locally, but still carry the routes and substitutes that work.
United States
Greater China
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Americas
Middle East & Africa
🇺🇸
United States
Nasdaq / NYSE Arca
7 products
Tax
US tax residents face no withholding or estate-tax friction: qualified dividends are taxed at 0/15/20% and the lifetime estate exclusion is far above typical household wealth. Trades inside a 401(k) or IRA are not currently taxed.
Access
Any broker works. Schwab, Fidelity, Vanguard and IBKR all offer commission-free ETF trading.
CLEC pickSource material: "in the US, buy QQQ." The most liquid Nasdaq-100 vehicle anywhere, but pricier than QQQM and estate-tax exposed for non-US residents.
The largest ETF in the world, at 0.03%. The source material only makes Nasdaq-100 recommendations and takes no position on US S&P 500 products; these are objective figures.
A covered-call strategy yielding roughly 13.7%, paid monthly. The source material is blunt: "if you are young and still working, avoid high-dividend products." This is for retirees who need the cash flow.
Launched July 2026 and now the cheapest US Nasdaq-100 ETF (0.12% gross, waived to 0.10% through July 2027). Still small. The source material’s claim that it is "popular in New Zealand" cannot be true — it did not exist yet.
🇨🇳
Mainland China
上交所 / 深交所
19 products
Tax
You hold units of an onshore fund, not US assets, so US estate tax does not apply; US dividend withholding is paid at the fund level. Capital gains on onshore fund units are currently exempt from individual income tax.
Access
Buy on-exchange through any broker app, exactly like a stock. The source material recommends brokers over banks. For off-exchange QDII funds see our /qdii page.
Watch out
QDII FX quotas mean many funds are suspended or capped for creations (flagged in the table), and on-exchange prices routinely trade at a premium. Always check the day’s premium/discount before buying.
The largest mainland Nasdaq-100 ETF (¥34.7bn) — and among the most expensive at 1.00%. Scale buys liquidity and a lower chance of creation halts, at 0.4pp a year. The source material’s "¥14.7bn" is badly stale.
The largest and oldest mainland S&P 500 ETF (¥24.0bn, 2013), still open for creations. The source material lists the ticker but makes no recommendation among mainland S&P 500 products.
The oldest and most actively traded mainland Nasdaq-100 ETF (2013, ¥19.5bn). Creations are currently suspended, so it trades at a persistent premium — the exact problem the source material keeps flagging. Its "¥6.2bn" figure is stale.
At ¥13.3bn and still open for creations — one of the few mainland Nasdaq trackers that is both large and unlocked. The source material’s "¥1.68bn" is stale.
Bottom-tier 0.60% fee, ¥12.4bn in assets, still open for creations. ★ Correction: the source md wrote "Harvest ETF Dacheng (159501)", merging two separate funds — 159501 is Harvest, 159513 is Dacheng.
This is a LOF, not an ETF — the source material flags this explicitly. It trades like a stock but uses a different creation mechanism, usually tracks less tightly, and is currently closed to creations.
A LOF rather than an ETF, at 1.00% and closed to creations. The source material lists it among LOFs said to be delisting — verify against the manager’s own announcements.
Hong Kong itself levies no capital gains or dividend tax. That does not make every ticker equivalent: a US-domiciled fund trading in Hong Kong (3455) still carries US estate tax and 30% dividend withholding, while a Hong Kong-domiciled ETF does not.
Access
Local brokers and banks all work. Many funds list both HKD and USD counters (3086 / 9086) — pick the one matching the currency you already hold to avoid an extra conversion.
Watch out
The source material’s claim that "Hong Kong has no S&P 500 fund" is out of date: the Hang Seng S&P 500 Index ETF (3195 HKD / 9195 USD) listed in April 2024 — though its fees are well above offshore equivalents.
AddedThe single clearest teaching case on this page: 3455 *is* US-listed QQQ, merely cross-traded in Hong Kong dollars. Same city, same index — 3086 carries no US estate tax, 3455 does. The source material flags it as "carries US estate tax risk." The AUM shown is the parent fund’s, not this thinly-traded HK line.
The largest locally-domiciled Nasdaq-100 ETF in Hong Kong, marginally cheaper than 3086. The source material notes HSBC and Citi clients in Singapore cannot buy LSE-listed ETFs but can buy this one.
The first ticker listed in the source material’s Hong Kong section — a listing, not an endorsement. Both HKD (3086) and USD (9086) counters. Hong Kong-domiciled, so no US estate tax: its fundamental advantage over 3455.
AddedDirectly refutes the source material’s "Hong Kong has no S&P 500 fund": this is the city’s first, listed April 2024. Be honest about the cost though — a 0.90% ongoing charge is thirty times VOO’s 0.03%, worth it only if you must stay inside the HK market.
The source material treats this as Hong Kong’s answer to QQQI — similar yield while dodging the 30% US dividend withholding. Watch the timeline though: it only launched in September 2025, so the claimed "HK$10.20 of distributions over the past 12 months" cannot hold. Check the issuer’s actual distribution history. AUM could not be verified this round.
Two-times daily leverage — a short-term rebalancing tool only. At roughly HK$76m it is thinly traded.
🇹🇼
Taiwan
TWSE
2 products
Tax
Distributions from Taiwan-domiciled ETFs count as offshore income under the AMT regime, which most retail investors fall below. Buying US-listed ETFs through a sub-brokerage account instead puts you back under US rules: 30% dividend withholding plus US estate-tax exposure.
Access
Several brokers support automatic monthly investing into 00662, which is the source material’s main recommendation for Taiwan. Sub-brokerage gives access to US ETFs, subject to the tax differences above.
Watch out
Do not confuse them: 00858 tracks the STOXX USA 500, not the S&P 500. The genuine S&P 500 tracker is 00646.
CLEC pickSource material: "for investors in Taiwan we only recommend Fubon NASDAQ 00662." Taiwan’s only Nasdaq-100 ETF, at NT$109.5bn, with broad broker support for monthly auto-investing.
AddedThe source material omits Taiwan’s S&P 500 options entirely. 00646 is the genuine S&P 500 tracker (don’t confuse it with 00858, which tracks the STOXX USA 500), at NT$46.2bn.
🇯🇵
Japan
TSE
4 products
Tax
Gains inside a NISA are tax-free and it is the default wrapper; both Japan-domiciled ETFs and some US ETFs qualify. The Japan–US treaty cuts US dividend withholding to 10%, far gentler than the usual 30% — but US estate-tax exposure remains.
Access
Rakuten and SBI both work; the source material notes both waive the buy-side commission on QQQ (sell side still charged).
Watch out
2568 and 2569 are the unhedged and hedged versions of the same fund; hedging the yen is rarely advisable for a long-term US equity holding. The issuer, formerly Nikko AM, was renamed Amova in 2025.
CLEC pickSource material: "in Japan you can buy 2568 (2569 hedged)." 2569 is its currency-hedged twin; hedging the yen is rarely advisable for a long-term US equity holding. The issuer, formerly Nikko AM, was renamed Amova in 2025.
Japan’s largest Nasdaq-100 ETF at 0.20%, launched 2010. The source material’s "¥45.4bn" is badly stale — NISA-driven inflows have taken it into the trillions of yen.
AddedThe source material omits Japan’s S&P 500 options. 1655 charges just 0.083% and is NISA-eligible. Note it is a fund-of-fund that gets its exposure by holding US-listed IVV.
The source material calls it "larger and cheaper." The fee does match 1545, but its assets are far smaller.
🇰🇷
South Korea
KRX
5 products
Tax
Distributions from Korea-domiciled overseas-index ETFs are taxed at 15.4%; buying US shares directly instead triggers 22% overseas capital gains tax above a ₩2.5m annual exemption. The ISA wrapper adds further relief and is the default container. Local ETFs carry no US estate-tax exposure.
Access
Korea Investment, Mirae Asset, KB and Samsung broker apps all trade these directly.
Watch out
All three tickers in the source material still work, but two brands were renamed: KBSTAR became RISE (2024) and KINDEX became ACE (2022). Korea’s ETF price war has also pushed RISE 368590 down to 0.01% — compare current all-in fees carefully.
Korea’s largest and oldest Nasdaq-100 ETF (₩11.47tn, 2010) at 0.07%. The source material’s Korean tickers are right, but two of the three brand names have since changed — see below.
AddedThe "Kim Kindex" brand in the source material no longer exists: Korea Investment’s KINDEX range was renamed ACE in 2022. The 367380 ticker is unchanged.
AddedOne of the cheapest Nasdaq-100 ETFs in the world at 0.01% — a eighteenth of QQQ’s 0.18%. The "KB KBSTAR" brand in the source material was renamed RISE in 2024. Korea’s ETF price war has produced fees you will not find in any other market.
Singapore levies no capital gains tax and no personal dividend tax, so the local side is frictionless. Every problem comes from the US side: 30% dividend withholding plus estate-tax exposure on US-domiciled funds. Irish-domiciled UCITS ETFs are the standard answer.
Access
From the source material’s own testing: IBKR, FSMOne and Standard Chartered can all buy Irish-domiciled ETFs on the LSE; HSBC and Citi cannot buy LSE-listed ETFs but can buy Hong Kong’s 2834 and 7261.
Watch out
SGX lists no local Nasdaq-100 or S&P 500 ETF — use the Irish-domiciled tickers in the UK section (CNDX / CSPX). The source material also notes there is no TQQQ equivalent available in Singapore.
🇲🇾
Malaysia
Bursa Malaysia
No local listing
Tax
Malaysia levies no capital gains tax; the exemption for remitted foreign income has been revised several times, so confirm the current rule. As in Singapore, the real costs are the 30% US dividend withholding and estate-tax exposure — both avoided with an Irish UCITS.
Access
The source material notes Malaysian citizens can open a Phillip Securities Singapore (POEMS) account online, which reaches the LSE-listed Irish ETFs. Local brokers and IBKR also work.
Watch out
Bursa Malaysia lists no Nasdaq-100 or S&P 500 ETF — use the Irish-domiciled tickers in the UK section.
🇦🇺
Australia
ASX
3 products
Tax
Australian-domiciled ETFs pass through foreign income tax offsets, which simplifies filing; holding US-domiciled ETFs directly creates US estate-tax exposure. Assets held over 12 months get the 50% CGT discount — the backdrop to the source material’s "borrow against it rather than sell" argument.
Access
CommSec, Stake, Selfwealth and IBKR all work. Stake offers SMSF accounts with US-market access, at roughly A$999/year in audit and accounting fees.
Watch out
IBKR Australia retail clients cannot draw cash against stock: borrowing is capped at A$50,000 and the proceeds cannot leave the brokerage account. Only wholesale/sophisticated status unlocks it.
CLEC pickSource material: "for friends in Australia, buy NDQ locally." The country’s largest Nasdaq-100 ETF at A$9.0bn, and the main collateral for IBKR Australia lending — roughly 30% initial margin, implying up to 70% LVR.
AddedThe source material omits Australia’s S&P 500 options. IVV.AX charges just 0.04%, among the cheapest US-equity exposure on the ASX. Its listing date could not be verified reliably this round (the fund converted from CDI to Australian domicile), so it is left blank.
One of the world’s more unusual regimes, and exactly what stumped the New Zealand reader in the source material: directly-held foreign ETFs fall under the FIF rules, requiring annual accounting and tax at your marginal rate of up to 39%. A local PIE fund caps tax at 28% and handles the filing for you. That gap usually dwarfs any fee difference.
Access
Buy the PIE-structured Foundation Series through InvestNow; Hatch, Sharesies and IBKR reach US ETFs directly but leave FIF filing to you.
Watch out
The source material’s "iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) is popular in New Zealand too" cannot be right — IQQ only listed in July 2026. The Smartshares US Large Growth ETF (USG.NZ) it also mentions tracks a US large-cap growth index rather than the Nasdaq-100, and reliable data could not be obtained this round, so it is not listed here.
CLEC pickThe source material calls it "the New Zealand-wrapped QQQM," which is exactly right — it buys Invesco QQQM. The 0.15% management fee matches the underlying ETF. The point is the PIE structure: tax is capped at 28%, versus up to a 39% marginal rate on directly-held foreign ETFs — precisely the problem the New Zealand reader in the source material was stuck on. Note the 0.50% buy/sell fee. Unlisted; bought through the InvestNow platform, so there is no ticker.
🇹🇭
Thailand
SET
No local listing
Tax
Since 2024, Thai tax residents (183+ days) must declare foreign income remitted into Thailand — a tightening that matters especially to long-stay expats. US-domiciled ETFs still carry the 30% withholding and estate-tax exposure.
Access
Local houses (SCB, Kasikorn) offer feeder mutual funds tracking the Nasdaq-100; for ETFs directly, use an international broker such as IBKR and prefer Irish-domiciled products.
Watch out
The SET lists no local Nasdaq-100 or S&P 500 ETF, and local feeder funds typically cost far more than an Irish UCITS — compare all-in fees first.
🇮🇳
India
NSE / BSE
1 products
Tax
Indian residents may remit up to $250,000 a year under the LRS, with tax collected at source above a threshold. Buying the locally-listed Nasdaq-100 ETF does not consume LRS headroom, which is why most people use it.
Access
Zerodha and Groww trade MON100 directly; platforms like Vested and Winvesta offer US-market access via the LRS.
Watch out
SEBI caps industry-wide overseas investment at $7bn. When it binds, the entire industry’s foreign funds stop creations — it has happened repeatedly — and on-exchange prices then trade at a marked premium. Check both before buying.
India’s only established Nasdaq-100 ETF, launched 2011. The constraint is not the product but the quota: SEBI caps industry-wide overseas investment at $7bn, and when it binds the whole industry’s foreign funds suspend creations — which has happened repeatedly. Check whether subscriptions are open, and the on-exchange premium, before buying. AUM could not be verified this round.
🇵🇭
Philippines
PSE
No local listing
Tax
The Philippines taxes residents on worldwide income, so foreign investment gains must be declared. US-domiciled ETFs carry the usual 30% withholding and estate-tax exposure; an Irish UCITS is the better route.
Access
Local brokers offer no overseas ETF access; IBKR or a similar international broker is the usual route.
🇮🇩
Indonesia
IDX
No local listing
Tax
Indonesia taxes residents on worldwide income. The IDX lists no Nasdaq-100 or S&P 500 ETF; local access is through Reksa Dana mutual funds, which usually cost more. Buying US ETFs directly brings the 30% withholding and estate-tax exposure.
Access
Use IBKR or a similar international broker to buy Irish-domiciled UCITS ETFs.
🇻🇳
Vietnam
HOSE
No local listing
Tax
Vietnam operates capital controls, and the limits on individual outbound investment bind harder than tax does. Confirm a compliant route before investing offshore.
Access
No local Nasdaq-100 or S&P 500 ETF. Those with offshore status or accounts can buy Irish UCITS through an international broker.
🇬🇧
United Kingdom
LSE
4 products
Tax
ISAs and SIPPs are fully tax-sheltered and are the default wrapper. Irish-domiciled UCITS ETFs sidestep US estate tax entirely; also check the fund carries UK Reporting Fund Status, or gains are taxed as income rather than capital gains — CNDX and CSPX both do.
Access
Hargreaves Lansdown, AJ Bell, Interactive Investor and IBKR all work.
Watch out
Most UK brokers will not let you buy the 3x LQQ3 mentioned in the source material; Hargreaves Lansdown opens it after a short appropriateness test. Leveraged products are rebalancing tools, not long-term holdings.
CLEC pickSource material: "CSPX.L tracks SPY most closely — invest in this one." Europe’s largest S&P 500 ETF at $116bn, 0.07%, Irish-domiciled and accumulating.
CLEC pickThis is exactly what the source material recommends for the UK. Irish-domiciled, USD-priced, accumulating — no distribution means one less tax event and one less reinvestment step. For any non-US tax resident this is the standard Nasdaq-100 answer. The material also notes Xtrackers’ XNAS is marginally cheaper but takes a lower LTV as collateral.
The source material lists both VUSD.L (USD distributing) and VUAG.L (accumulating). Same fund, different share classes — prefer accumulating for a long-term hold.
Europe’s oldest Nasdaq-100 ETF (2002), recommended in the source material for continental investors. It distributes, which is the only real difference from CNDX: take EQQQ if you want the cash flow, CNDX if you want pure compounding.
🇪🇺
Eurozone (DE / FR / IT)
XETRA / Euronext / Borsa Italiana
3 products
Tax
Germany taxes investment income at a flat 25% plus solidarity surcharge, with a basic allowance; France applies a 30% flat tax, though a PEA becomes income-tax free after five years (the source material notes the PEA’s €150,000 cap). In every case, an Irish- or Luxembourg-domiciled UCITS avoids US estate tax.
Access
DEGIRO, Trade Republic, Scalable Capital, finanzen.net zero and flatex all work. The same fund carries different tickers on different exchanges — pick the line with good liquidity in your account’s currency.
Watch out
The LQQ.PA / LQQ.MI / L817.F / L817.DE list in the source material is one 2x fund quoted on four venues, not four products. Leveraged products suit short-term rebalancing only and are not listed here.
Source material: "SXRV.DE is available on many European exchanges." True — and worth understanding fully: SXRV.DE and CNDX.L in the UK section are the *same fund* (both ISIN IE00B53SZB19), merely trading in euros in Frankfurt and dollars in London. Which line you buy depends on the currency you already hold; the fund is identical. (The two AUM figures on this page come from different exchange pages and differ slightly in timing.)
The source material lists it as the European alternative to QQQM. At 0.22% it undercuts SXRV and EQQQ, but it replicates the index through a swap rather than holding the shares — that adds counterparty risk and buys dividend-tax efficiency. Formerly a Lyxor product, now folded into Amundi.
🇨🇭
Switzerland
SIX
No local listing
Tax
Switzerland exempts private investors’ capital gains, which is a substantial advantage; dividends are taxed as income and wealth tax applies separately. An Irish-domiciled UCITS remains the standard way to avoid US estate tax.
Access
Swissquote, PostFinance and IBKR all work. What lists on SIX is the same set of Irish UCITS shown in the UK and Eurozone sections, on a different trading line.
🇳🇱
Netherlands
Euronext Amsterdam
No local listing
Tax
The Dutch Box 3 regime taxes a deemed return on assets rather than realised gains — so tax can arise even if you never sell, or lose money. The rules have been under continuous reform; long-term investors should track the current version.
Access
DEGIRO and IBKR both work — buy the Irish-domiciled UCITS listed in the Eurozone section.
🇪🇸
Spain
BME
No local listing
Tax
Spain taxes savings income progressively from 19% to 28% and levies wealth tax, with wide regional variation. Note that Spain’s roll-over deferral for switching between mutual funds does not extend to ETFs — which affects long-term rebalancing plans.
Access
IBKR, DEGIRO and local bank brokerages all work — buy the Irish-domiciled UCITS from the Eurozone section.
🇵🇹
Portugal
Euronext Lisbon
No local listing
Tax
Portugal taxes capital gains at 28%. It became a popular destination on the back of the golden visa and tax breaks, but the original NHR regime closed in 2024 and was replaced by a narrower successor — confirm which rules apply to you before planning around it.
Access
IBKR, DEGIRO and other international brokers all work — buy the Irish-domiciled UCITS from the Eurozone section.
🇸🇪
Nordics (SE / NO / DK / FI)
Nasdaq Nordic / Oslo Børs
No local listing
Tax
The Nordics offer tax-deferred wrappers: Sweden’s ISK and Norway’s ASK and investment accounts tax a deemed return on assets rather than realised gains, which strongly favours long holds. The wrapper restricts what you may buy, though — per the source material’s own testing, Nordnet’s pension account (PEN) cannot hold QQQ, only EQQQ, and the same applies to ASK.
Access
Nordnet is the dominant local broker; the source material documents how its three account types (investment / PEN / ASK) differ in both eligible holdings and when tax falls due. The investment account can trade US securities.
Watch out
The clearest case anywhere of the wrapper dictating the holding: decide the account type first, then the ticker. Doing it the other way round causes grief.
🇨🇦
Canada
TSX
7 products
Tax
Account type decides everything: US-domiciled ETFs held in an RRSP are exempt from the 15% dividend withholding under the Canada–US treaty; inside a TFSA they are not. HXQ’s non-distributing corporate-class total-return structure has no dividend to withhold at all — the reason the source material favours it.
Access
Wealthsimple, Questrade and the big-bank brokerages all work. Wealthsimple now offers a portfolio-secured line of credit at roughly 3.95% above C$500k, capped at 35% of account assets.
Watch out
The source material’s "Horizons / BetaPro" branding is retired — it is now Global X Investments Canada, and QQC is run by Invesco Canada. The CAD-hedged XQQ accumulates hedging costs over long holds.
CLEC pickSource material: "in Canada we still recommend HXQ.TO." A non-distributing corporate-class total-return structure — no dividend means nothing to withhold, maximising after-tax return in non-registered accounts. Note the MER moved from the quoted 0.27% to 0.28%, and Horizons is now Global X.
Canada’s largest Nasdaq-100 ETF, but CAD-hedged. Hedging a long-term US equity holding is rarely advisable — the cost compounds against you year after year.
Canada’s cheapest Nasdaq-100 ETF at 0.21%, but it distributes, so non-registered holders eat the 15% US withholding. Both the quoted 0.20% and the "Global X" attribution need correcting — it is run by Invesco Canada.
🇧🇷
Brazil
B3
2 products
Tax
Brazil taxes ETF disposals at 15% with none of the small-trade exemption that applies to shares, and you must file it yourself. B3-listed local funds carry no US estate-tax exposure; directly-held US ETFs do.
Access
XP, Rico, Clear and NuInvest all trade these directly.
Watch out
The source material mentions only NASD11 and omits the far larger IVVB11. Both are locally domiciled and traded in reais, so FX moves flow straight into the NAV.
AddedAddition: the source material mentions only NASD11, not this one. It is Brazil’s largest and most liquid US-equity ETF (R$7.6bn, over seven times NASD11), launched 2014, and cheaper. These are objective figures — the source material takes no position on Brazilian products.
Source material: "Brazil recently got a Nasdaq index fund, NASD11." It actually launched in May 2021, is run by XP’s Trend arm, and at roughly R$1bn is mid-sized locally.
🇲🇽
Mexico
BMV (SIC)
No local listing
Tax
Mexico has a mechanism few countries offer: the International Quotation System (SIC) lets a local brokerage account trade US-listed ETFs settled in pesos. Convenient — but what you own is still a US-domiciled fund, with the full 30% withholding and estate-tax exposure. That is the part people miss.
Access
GBM+, Actinver and Kuspit offer QQQ, VOO and the rest through the SIC. To escape US estate tax you must instead use an international broker and buy Irish-domiciled UCITS.
🇦🇷
Argentina
BYMA
No local listing
Tax
Argentines mostly hold US assets indirectly through CEDEARs — depositary receipts including SPY and QQQ equivalents, tradable in pesos, which is the standard workaround for capital controls. But a CEDEAR still sits on US-domiciled assets and adds issuer and custody risk on top; it is not equivalent to owning the ETF.
Access
Balanz, IOL and PPI all trade CEDEARs.
Watch out
Individual CEDEARs are not listed here: their conversion ratios and terms are set by each issuer and change over time — check the broker’s and issuer’s current notices.
🇦🇪
UAE
ADX / DFM
No local listing
Tax
The UAE levies no personal income or capital gains tax, which is why it has drawn so many high-net-worth movers. Zero income tax is not zero tax, though: US-domiciled ETFs are still withheld at 30%, and with no US–UAE estate tax treaty the estate exposure is if anything a stronger reason to use Irish-domiciled UCITS.
Access
IBKR, Saxo and local banks’ international platforms all reach the LSE-listed Irish UCITS.
Watch out
Neither local exchange lists a Nasdaq-100 or S&P 500 ETF — use the Irish-domiciled tickers in the UK section.
🇮🇱
Israel
TASE
No local listing
Tax
Israel taxes investment income at 25% on real gains. The TASE lists several locally-issued Nasdaq-100 trackers (the "Sal" range), which avoid US estate tax by virtue of local domicile — but documentation is largely in Hebrew and public data is patchy.
Access
Local bank brokerages and IBKR both work — local products trade on TASE, offshore ones through an international broker.
Watch out
Fees and sizes for the TASE-listed products are not shown: reliable figures could not be obtained from authoritative sources this round, and the rule here is to leave unverified fields blank. Check TASE or the issuer directly.
🇿🇦
South Africa
JSE
2 products
Tax
South Africa folds a portion of capital gains into income tax with an annual exclusion, and separately limits offshore transfers to R1m discretionary plus R10m foreign investment allowance per year. JSE-listed local funds consume neither allowance and carry no US estate-tax exposure — the main reason locals use them.
Access
EasyEquities, Standard Bank Online Share Trading and other local platforms trade these directly.
Watch out
STXNDQ converted from a feeder to a standard portfolio in January 2025 and switched from total-return to distributing, which limits how far its historical record is comparable.
AddedSouth Africa is absent from the source material entirely. Launched 2018 as a feeder fund holding the Irish iShares Nasdaq-100 UCITS, it converted to a standard direct-holding portfolio in January 2025 to cut the expense ratio, switching from total-return to distributing at the same time. A reliable post-conversion TER could not be obtained this round — check Satrix’s current figure.
Sources and methodology
Data last verified: 2026-08-16
—Every figure comes from the issuer’s own page, the listing exchange or stockanalysis.com — never from the reference document. Mainland China rows come from Eastmoney fund profile pages; the fee is management plus custody, and size is as of 2026-06-30. Fields that could not be verified are left blank as "—" and are never estimated.
—Sizes are converted to USD so they can be compared across regions, using 2026-08-16 closing rates. For the size in the fund’s own currency, refer to the issuer page.
—Tracking error is deliberately not shown: disclosure conventions differ by country (annualised standard deviation vs cumulative deviation, NAV vs market price), so a single column would be false precision. Where it genuinely matters — premium/discount on mainland China listings — use the "Jisilu premium" link on the row.
—The size of 3451.HK could not be verified this round, and IVV.AX’s inception date could not be confirmed reliably because the fund converted from CDI to Australian domicile. Both are left blank.
—Errors found and corrected against the reference document include: Hong Kong does have an S&P 500 ETF (3195/9195, listed April 2024); IQQ only launched in July 2026; Korea’s KBSTAR and KINDEX brands have been renamed; Canada’s Horizons is now Global X and QQC is run by Invesco Canada; 159501 and 159513 are two separate funds; and several mainland fund sizes were badly out of date.
This page organises investment knowledge and is not investment advice. Items marked "CLEC pick" reflect the channel’s own view — make your own judgement. Past performance does not indicate future results.