Skip to main content
CLEC Investment & WealthCLEC Investment & Wealth
  1. Home
  2. Video
  3. Short
  4. We All Underestimated It: What QQQ's 40-Year Run and 18% Annualized Return Teach Us
We All Underestimated It: What QQQ's 40-Year Run and 18% Annualized Return Teach Us
Unable to play this video: We All Underestimated It: What QQQ's 40-Year Run and 18% Annualized Return Teach Us

Video information

00522

We All Underestimated It: What QQQ's 40-Year Run and 18% Annualized Return Teach Us

The video lists annualized return figures for the Nasdaq-100, NDX, a total-return version, and QQQ, then warns that historical performance does not guarantee future gains.

Published
Aug 18, 2025
Total duration
1:48
Source
CLEC Investment & Wealth

Categories

  • Short

Video Overview

The video lists historical Nasdaq-100 figures. It says the NDX backfilled period from 1986 produced an annualized return of about 13.97% excluding dividends. For a total-return version through the first quarter of 2025, it gives 6.44% for one year, 20.96% for five years, 22.19% for ten years, and roughly 17% to 18% since 1985 with dividends. It also states that QQQ returned about 18.44% annualized over the past decade with dividend reinvestment. These figures are reproduced only from the transcript and were not externally verified. The final section says past returns do not ensure future gains, notes that an individual year could lose about 30%, and discusses holding cash as a risk buffer.

Key Takeaways

  • The video states that NDX returned about 13.97% annualized over its backfilled period from 1986, excluding dividends.
  • It lists one-, five-, ten-year, and full-period total-return figures and says QQQ returned about 18.44% annualized over the past decade with dividends reinvested.
  • The video warns that historical performance does not guarantee future results, cites a possible annual loss of about 30%, and favors a cash buffer.

Chapters

About 00:00:09 · Long-term Nasdaq-100 figures

The video begins with the NDX history and an annualized figure excluding dividends.

About 00:00:35 · Total-return and QQQ figures

It then lists dividend-inclusive measures and multi-period figures for QQQ.

About 00:01:11 · Historical returns and loss risk

The final portion says past performance is not assured and discusses cash as a buffer.

Related Topics

Nasdaq-100, NDX, QQQ, annualized returns, dividend reinvestment, historical performance, market drawdowns, cash allocation

This page was prepared with AI from selected portions of the video's audio to help readers understand the main topics. It may omit secondary material or contain transcription errors; the original video remains authoritative.

All Videos

More Videos

Grok, Tesla FSD, ChatGPT, and Gemini: The Era of AI Agents Has Arrived
00701May 23, 2026

Grok, Tesla FSD, ChatGPT, and Gemini: The Era of AI Agents Has Arrived

Short

Grok, Tesla FSD, ChatGPT, and Gemini: The Era of AI Agents Has Arrived

The video demonstrates Gemini retrieving teaching links from past email, relays an AI-agent subscription-refund story, and shows Grok voice requests connected with Tesla navigation and supervised driving.

May 23, 202625:29
Do Insurance Loans Really Require No Interest Payments? Do Not Fall for the Sales Pitch—Education and Financial Security Cannot Be Outsourced
00700May 22, 2026

Do Insurance Loans Really Require No Interest Payments? Do Not Fall for the Sales Pitch—Education and Financial Security Cannot Be Outsourced

Short

Do Insurance Loans Really Require No Interest Payments? Do Not Fall for the Sales Pitch—Education and Financial Security Cannot Be Outsourced

The video says a policy loan without monthly payments is not interest-free: interest may increase debt or reduce cash value. It also covers claim disputes, surrender decisions, AI, and parental involvement in learning.

May 22, 202637:08
True security is not having no debt, but always having cash on hand
00699May 20, 2026

True security is not having no debt, but always having cash on hand

Short

True security is not having no debt, but always having cash on hand

The speaker argues that debt does not eliminate the need for cash because property, investments, and employment can fail together. A 30% cash example and 80% decline scenario test whether forced selling can be avoided.

May 20, 202619:19
CLEC Investment & WealthCLEC Investment & Wealth

CLEC content, long-term investing tools, and source materials for learning and independent review.

X (Twitter)Apple Podcasts
Tools
  • Start Here
  • Related
  • Investing Tools
  • Nasdaq-100 DCA Calculator
  • Asset Allocation Simulator
  • Global ETF Comparison
  • Global Nasdaq & S&P ETF Map
  • Mainland China U.S. Index QDII Comparison
  • QQQ returns by year
  • SPY returns by year
Resources
  • Blog
  • Documentation
  • Video
  • The CLEC Handbook
  • Database
About
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Waitlist
  • Changelog
  • Roadmap
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer
  • Anti-Fraud Notice
© 2026 CLEC Investment & Wealth. All rights reserved.·Sitemap