Skip to main content
CLEC Investment & WealthCLEC Investment & Wealth
  1. Home
  2. Video
  3. Short
  4. Stop Waiting for a Broken Elevator: The Investing Turning Point from Escaping Losses to a Steady Rebirth
Stop Waiting for a Broken Elevator: The Investing Turning Point from Escaping Losses to a Steady Rebirth
Unable to play this video: Stop Waiting for a Broken Elevator: The Investing Turning Point from Escaping Losses to a Steady Rebirth

Video information

00528

Stop Waiting for a Broken Elevator: The Investing Turning Point from Escaping Losses to a Steady Rebirth

A Taiwan-based investor lost nearly NT$1 million in individual stocks and ETFs and asks about selling at a loss for 00662. The speaker responds with an elevator analogy, a 70/30 allocation, and views on borrowing.

Published
Aug 26, 2025
Total duration
3:35
Source
CLEC Investment & Wealth

Categories

  • Short

Video Overview

The writer began investing two years earlier and bought Hon Hai, TSMC, other individual stocks, and assorted ETFs while spending substantial time gathering information. Losses became severe from August of the previous year, and the writer reports being trapped during the tariff conflict with losses approaching NT$1 million. After recently selling individual stocks and ETFs for 00662, the writer asks whether taking the losses was appropriate and whether the 30% cash allocation can be held in 00865B. Total funds are NT$11 million; the writer owns a home and has adult children. The speaker uses replacing a broken elevator as an analogy, proposes 70% in 00662 and 30% in 00865B, and says this case does not require loans or securities-backed borrowing.

Key Takeaways

  • The writer says losses in individual stocks and ETFs became severe from the previous August and approached NT$1 million during the tariff conflict.
  • In response to selling losing positions for 00662, the speaker uses a broken-elevator analogy and argues against waiting for the previous holdings to recover.
  • For NT$11 million in funds, the speaker proposes 70% in 00662 and 30% in 00865B and says the case does not require additional loans or pledged shares.

Chapters

About 00:00:22 · Losses in stocks and ETFs

The writer recounts starting to invest, gathering information, and losing nearly NT$1 million.

About 00:01:45 · The response to selling at a loss

Using an elevator analogy, the speaker addresses selling the previous stocks and funds for 00662.

About 00:02:10 · A 70/30 allocation and borrowing

The speaker presents a split between 00662 and 00865B and responds to questions about loans and pledged shares.

Related Topics

investment losses, selling individual stocks, 00662, 00865B, 70/30 allocation, securities-backed borrowing, long-term investing

This page was prepared with AI from selected portions of the video's audio to help readers understand the main topics. It may omit secondary material or contain transcription errors; the original video remains authoritative.

All Videos

More Videos

Grok, Tesla FSD, ChatGPT, and Gemini: The Era of AI Agents Has Arrived
00701May 23, 2026

Grok, Tesla FSD, ChatGPT, and Gemini: The Era of AI Agents Has Arrived

Short

Grok, Tesla FSD, ChatGPT, and Gemini: The Era of AI Agents Has Arrived

The video demonstrates Gemini retrieving teaching links from past email, relays an AI-agent subscription-refund story, and shows Grok voice requests connected with Tesla navigation and supervised driving.

May 23, 202625:29
Do Insurance Loans Really Require No Interest Payments? Do Not Fall for the Sales Pitch—Education and Financial Security Cannot Be Outsourced
00700May 22, 2026

Do Insurance Loans Really Require No Interest Payments? Do Not Fall for the Sales Pitch—Education and Financial Security Cannot Be Outsourced

Short

Do Insurance Loans Really Require No Interest Payments? Do Not Fall for the Sales Pitch—Education and Financial Security Cannot Be Outsourced

The video says a policy loan without monthly payments is not interest-free: interest may increase debt or reduce cash value. It also covers claim disputes, surrender decisions, AI, and parental involvement in learning.

May 22, 202637:08
True security is not having no debt, but always having cash on hand
00699May 20, 2026

True security is not having no debt, but always having cash on hand

Short

True security is not having no debt, but always having cash on hand

The speaker argues that debt does not eliminate the need for cash because property, investments, and employment can fail together. A 30% cash example and 80% decline scenario test whether forced selling can be avoided.

May 20, 202619:19
CLEC Investment & WealthCLEC Investment & Wealth

CLEC content, long-term investing tools, and source materials for learning and independent review.

X (Twitter)Apple Podcasts
Tools
  • Start Here
  • Related
  • Investing Tools
  • Nasdaq-100 DCA Calculator
  • Asset Allocation Simulator
  • Global ETF Comparison
  • Global Nasdaq & S&P ETF Map
  • Mainland China U.S. Index QDII Comparison
  • QQQ returns by year
  • SPY returns by year
Resources
  • Blog
  • Documentation
  • Video
  • The CLEC Handbook
  • Database
About
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Waitlist
  • Changelog
  • Roadmap
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer
  • Anti-Fraud Notice
© 2026 CLEC Investment & Wealth. All rights reserved.·Sitemap