Skip to main content
CLEC Investment & WealthCLEC Investment & Wealth
  1. Home
  2. Video
  3. Short
  4. Don’t use stocks as collateral to borrow 5 million at a time! Change to borrow from CITIC: 5 million redo 433 + pledge and only borrow 2% per year to repay the credit
Don’t use stocks as collateral to borrow 5 million at a time! Change to borrow from CITIC: 5 million redo 433 + pledge and only borrow 2% per year to repay the credit
Unable to play this video: Don’t use stocks as collateral to borrow 5 million at a time! Change to borrow from CITIC: 5 million redo 433 + pledge and only borrow 2% per year to repay the credit

Video information

00675

Don’t use stocks as collateral to borrow 5 million at a time! Change to borrow from CITIC: 5 million redo 433 + pledge and only borrow 2% per year to repay the credit

A nearly NT$40 million portfolio with over 80% in growth and leveraged holdings compares a one-time NT$5 million PAL draw with personal credit and a 433 rebalance.

Published
Mar 20, 2026
Total duration
5:36
Source
CLEC Investment & Wealth

Categories

  • Short

Video Overview

The portfolio is nearly NT$40 million. Holdings in 00662 and 00670L exceed 80%, while short bonds are about 17%, well away from the target 433 mix. The investor wants to borrow NT$5 million to rebalance and considers one large PAL draw because its rate appears lower, then placing the cash in short bonds. The speaker opposes borrowing NT$5 million at once against stocks and questions borrowing cash merely to hold cash-like assets. His alternative uses a personal loan for NT$5 million, invests it across all three 433 components, and then draws 2% annually from PAL to service principal and interest. One spoken passage sounds like 0.2%, while the title and surrounding discussion indicate 2%; this page reports only the case’s stated approach. Layered debt adds rate, margin-call, income, and market risks.

Key Takeaways

  • Growth and leveraged holdings exceed 80%, while short bonds are about 17%.
  • The speaker warns against one NT$5 million PAL draw.
  • Borrowing solely to buy short bonds is criticized as inefficient, which is the speaker’s judgment.
  • The alternative funds a 433 mix with personal credit and uses 2% PAL draws for debt service.

Chapters

About 00:00:00 · A portfolio far from 433

A portfolio far from 433.

About 00:01:31 · How to borrow NT$5 million

How to borrow NT$5 million.

About 00:03:00 · Borrowing cash to hold cash

Borrowing cash to hold cash.

About 00:04:29 · Separate roles for credit and PAL

Separate roles for credit and PAL.

Related Topics

433 allocation, NT$5 million loan, PAL lending, 00662, 00670L, Short bonds, Portfolio rebalancing, Layered leverage

This page was prepared with AI from selected portions of the video's audio to help readers understand the main topics. It may omit secondary material or contain transcription errors; the original video remains authoritative.

All Videos

More Videos

Grok, Tesla FSD, ChatGPT, and Gemini: The Era of AI Agents Has Arrived
00701May 23, 2026

Grok, Tesla FSD, ChatGPT, and Gemini: The Era of AI Agents Has Arrived

Short

Grok, Tesla FSD, ChatGPT, and Gemini: The Era of AI Agents Has Arrived

The video demonstrates Gemini retrieving teaching links from past email, relays an AI-agent subscription-refund story, and shows Grok voice requests connected with Tesla navigation and supervised driving.

May 23, 202625:29
Do Insurance Loans Really Require No Interest Payments? Do Not Fall for the Sales Pitch—Education and Financial Security Cannot Be Outsourced
00700May 22, 2026

Do Insurance Loans Really Require No Interest Payments? Do Not Fall for the Sales Pitch—Education and Financial Security Cannot Be Outsourced

Short

Do Insurance Loans Really Require No Interest Payments? Do Not Fall for the Sales Pitch—Education and Financial Security Cannot Be Outsourced

The video says a policy loan without monthly payments is not interest-free: interest may increase debt or reduce cash value. It also covers claim disputes, surrender decisions, AI, and parental involvement in learning.

May 22, 202637:08
True security is not having no debt, but always having cash on hand
00699May 20, 2026

True security is not having no debt, but always having cash on hand

Short

True security is not having no debt, but always having cash on hand

The speaker argues that debt does not eliminate the need for cash because property, investments, and employment can fail together. A 30% cash example and 80% decline scenario test whether forced selling can be avoided.

May 20, 202619:19
CLEC Investment & WealthCLEC Investment & Wealth

CLEC content, long-term investing tools, and source materials for learning and independent review.

X (Twitter)Apple Podcasts
Tools
  • Start Here
  • Related
  • Investing Tools
  • Nasdaq-100 DCA Calculator
  • Asset Allocation Simulator
  • Global ETF Comparison
  • Global Nasdaq & S&P ETF Map
  • Mainland China U.S. Index QDII Comparison
  • QQQ returns by year
  • SPY returns by year
Resources
  • Blog
  • Documentation
  • Video
  • The CLEC Handbook
  • Database
About
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Waitlist
  • Changelog
  • Roadmap
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer
  • Anti-Fraud Notice
© 2026 CLEC Investment & Wealth. All rights reserved.·Sitemap